Georgetown University LLM Technology Law and Policy

What is Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy?

The full-time LLM Technology Law and Policy runs 1 academic year, requires 20 credits and focuses on privacy, platform governance, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and technology policy. Georgetown’s official programme page defines that route. The Indian planning total is INR 122.99 lakh at the stated conversion basis.

The academic sequence moves from Information Privacy Law through AI and the Law and Cybersecurity Law toward Technology Policy Practicum, where technology-policy drafting becomes assessed evidence. This record covers the full-time in-person route only. Admission, funding, professional licensing, employment and immigration remain separate decisions.

How much does Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy cost for an Indian student?

The full-route estimate is USD 127,295, about INR 122.99 lakh. It uses Georgetown’s 2026-27 published cost basis, then adds the USD 90 application, USD 350 SEVIS and USD 185 F-1 visa fees where they are outside the institutional budget.

Housing deposits, licensing or bar-exam costs, equipment and exchange spread remain outside this estimate. USD 1 = INR 96.6149, from ECB reference rates checked on 22 October 2026.

The first line uses Georgetown’s 2026-27 published basis for this route: USD 89,916. The institution may revise rates before enrolment, and extra credits or additional terms can raise the final bill.

The non-tuition model is USD 36,754 across the stated 1 academic year route. It follows the applicable Georgetown cost-of-attendance categories for housing, food, books, personal spending and transport rather than assuming part-time earnings.

The setup line contains the USD 90 graduate application payment, USD 350 SEVIS I-901 fee and USD 185 F-1 visa application fee. Air travel, housing deposits, professional examinations, equipment and foreign-exchange spread remain outside the total.

Can an Indian graduate meet Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy entry requirements?

Conditionally. The programme requires a first law degree that permits legal practice or bar eligibility in its jurisdiction, plus the complete LL.M. file. Georgetown then applies its international graduate rules and programme-specific selection. Meeting a published floor is eligibility evidence, not an admission prediction. The review also tests how that preparation supports the intended course sequence.

For LLM Technology Law and Policy, the portfolio sample should make privacy analysis concrete before the file claims readiness for Information Privacy Law. A module title doesn’t prove that capability; a result, method and limitation show how the applicant actually used privacy analysis. The statement can then explain why AI and the Law must add AI governance research now.

The application should keep three jobs separate. Transcripts establish preparation for Information Privacy Law; referees verify observed cyber policy interpretation; the statement connects both to the Technology Policy Practicum component. That chain is more persuasive for LLM Technology Law and Policy than a generic account of Georgetown, Washington, DC or the degree’s prestige.

A document map for LLM Technology Law and Policy can be literal: mark the transcript line that supports Information Privacy Law, attach the work sample that demonstrates privacy analysis, and ask a referee to verify the decision behind cyber policy interpretation. The statement should then identify why Platform Governance is necessary before the applicant attempts Technology Policy Practicum. That order makes missing preparation visible early.

Four boundaries in the admission decision

1. A minimum is not an offer

   Programme fit, faculty capacity, references and the full applicant pool still affect selection.

2. Privacy Analysis needs evidence

   A named course, project or research result is stronger than a broad degree label for proving privacy analysis.

3. Research or portfolio fit is specific

   The application should connect the applicant’s record to the Technology Policy Practicum requirement.

4. Work rights are separate

   Admission does not settle visa issuance, OPT, employment, sponsorship or permanent residence.

How should an Indian student apply for Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy?

The official application point is 1 July 2027 final deadline. Start with the live programme checklist, then submit the complete academic, programme and international file before that point. Every required item must arrive on time; the application payment does not repair a missing requirement after closure.

Establish programme fit, assemble the exact evidence, submit before 1 July 2027 final deadline, then complete offer and F-1 requirements.

The allowances are Nbyula planning estimates, not processing times published by Georgetown University.

Preparation begins with the exact LLM Technology Law and Policy evidence chain. The transcript establishes academic history, the statement explains the intended work, and referees verify observed capability; none of those documents performs the job of another.

The application is complete only when programme-specific materials are present before 1 July 2027 final deadline. A later official transcript or offer condition is different from omitting an item required for review.

After an offer, the university’s acceptance, proof-of-funding and I-20 process precede the separate SEVIS payment and visa application. Admission itself is not an immigration decision.

International applicants should not submit supporting financial and sponsorship documentation during the initial application process, but should instead wait until after an official offer of admission has been made.Georgetown graduate application information

What can Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy lead to?

The curriculum can support evidence for technology lawyer, privacy counsel and AI policy analyst directions, but these are not placement predictions. An applicant still has to meet employer or regulator standards. USCIS OPT rules govern conditional work authorisation; licensing, bar admission, hiring and sponsorship remain separate.

These are curriculum-linked directions, not measured probabilities of employment, salary, sponsorship, licensing or permanent residence.

Evidence for a technology lawyer direction can come from Information Privacy Law, provided the record identifies the applicant’s own privacy analysis decisions. AI and the Law serves a different purpose: it can support privacy counsel work by showing AI governance research in a result that another reader can inspect.

The Cybersecurity Law component may strengthen an AI policy analyst case through cyber policy interpretation, while Technology Policy Practicum can anchor discussion of cyber regulation adviser work through technology-policy drafting. These aren’t measured job probabilities for LLM Technology Law and Policy; employer standards, licensing and immigration still set independent thresholds.

A useful LLM Technology Law and Policy work sample preserves four things: the question taken from Information Privacy Law, the method strengthened through AI and the Law, the limitation uncovered in Cybersecurity Law, and the final decision made during Technology Policy Practicum. That record lets a technology lawyer, privacy counsel or AI policy analyst reviewer see contribution rather than infer it from the Georgetown degree title.

Who is Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy for?

LLM Technology Law and Policy fits an applicant who can show privacy analysis, needs AI governance research, accepts the Technology Policy Practicum component and can finance INR 122.99 lakh plus excluded costs. The strongest match can also explain why AI and the Law belongs in the intended next step.

The closest-fit applicant reaches Georgetown with evidence of privacy analysis, a defined need for AI governance research, and a reason to complete the Technology Policy Practicum component. Interest in Cybersecurity Law is not enough if the applicant would avoid Platform Governance or has no use for the work produced there.

A weaker fit wants the label of LLM Technology Law and Policy but cannot connect Information Privacy Law to a prior result or AI and the Law to a future task. Financial fit is separate: the INR 122.99 lakh model needs a reserve for excluded costs and can’t rest on uncertain US earnings.

The fit conversation should name the trade-off inside LLM Technology Law and Policy. Time spent on Information Privacy Law and AI and the Law is valuable for an applicant seeking AI governance research; the same time is wasteful for someone who already demonstrates it. Likewise, Platform Governance belongs in the plan only when the intended cyber regulation adviser direction can use the technology-policy drafting evidence produced through Technology Policy Practicum.

What does Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy cover?

The official programme source sets out the 20-credit route summarised below. Its later components include Platform Governance and Technology Policy Practicum. The rows distinguish named subjects, assessed work and the culminating requirement; they form an academic map, not a promise that every elective runs in every term.

The note “Named course, requirement or programme component” applies to 5 components in this table.

• Complete at least 20 approved graduate credits.
• Follow the full-time professionally oriented plan and its academic standing rules.
• Complete 20 approved LL.M. credits with the programme's required legal writing and specialisation work.

Information Privacy Law establishes one part of the programme’s method base, while AI and the Law develops the second. Their practical value depends on the actual assignment, approved research or project plan and the standard applied to the final work.

The degree culminates in 20 approved LL.M. credits with the programme’s required legal writing and specialisation work. Adviser capacity, elective availability, ethics approval, internship placement or production resources can affect the individual sequence where relevant.

Georgetown may revise course availability and sequencing before enrolment. The admitted student’s written plan and current catalog govern the final combination rather than an editorial sample assembled in advance.

Should an Indian student shortlist Georgetown LLM Technology Law and Policy?

The central comparison for LLM Technology Law and Policy is whether earlier privacy analysis work can progress through AI and the Law into the Technology Policy Practicum component. The INR 122.99 lakh plan only makes sense when that academic move and the financing plan are both credible.

A strong yes-case for LLM Technology Law and Policy starts with inspectable privacy analysis, adds the missing AI governance research demanded by AI and the Law, and uses Technology Policy Practicum to preserve evidence of technology-policy drafting. That sequence can support a later technology lawyer or privacy counsel application without turning either occupation into a promised result.

Reject this option when Information Privacy Law repeats completed study, when Platform Governance is outside the intended work, or when the applicant does not want the Technology Policy Practicum requirement. It is also the wrong financial choice if the INR 122.99 lakh estimate depends on a guaranteed technology lawyer salary, because Georgetown publishes no such guarantee.

Sources

These sources support the programme, admission, cost and immigration information used on this page.

Sources checked on October 22, 2026. Current intake information follows. Fall 2027 full-time intake.