Georgetown University MA Global Human Development

What is the Georgetown University MA Global Human Development?

The Georgetown University MA Global Human Development is a 48-credit full-time master’s route based in Washington, DC. The programme runs for about 24 months and centres on international development practice and policy. This page covers the full-time route only, including its current cost basis, application evidence and curriculum.

For an Indian applicant, the decision has four independent tests: preparation in development economics, a workable Fall 2027 application timeline, funding for the complete INR 1.95 crore planning case, and a clear use for summer field project and client-based capstone. Clearing one test does not compensate for missing another.

How much does the Georgetown University MA Global Human Development cost for an Indian student?

The full planning case is USD 202,249, about INR 1.95 crore. It combines the latest published or schedule-derived tuition and fees, Georgetown’s graduate living categories for 24 months, the application fee, SEVIS and the F-1 visa fee, before flights and a housing deposit.

The table treats the SEVIS and visa charges as separate payments. It does not add a second visa-maintenance total because the complete living plan already covers the study period. Converted at USD 1 = INR 96.33, derived from ECB reference rates dated 1 October 2026.

Georgetown requires international graduate students to submit a financial guarantee before the university can issue an I-20.Georgetown international graduate admission

The living line starts from Georgetown’s published annual graduate categories. Those figures include housing and meals, books and supplies, transport and personal costs. The 24-month multiplication is a planning assumption, so a shorter completion pattern or different housing choice changes the total.

The tuition line is a transparent calculation of 48 credits from the current school-specific 2026-27 tuition basis. It is not an invoice. Programme fees, term load and future board decisions can change what Georgetown bills.

Flights, exchange spreads, a refundable housing deposit and personal contingency remain outside the table. They vary too much to attach one official amount to every applicant, but they still need cash in the funding plan before departure.

A scholarship should reduce the plan only after it appears in a written award. Campus employment is limited, competitive and dependent on authorisation, so it is not a sound way to close a known tuition gap at the application stage.

The estimate isn’t an invoice, doesn’t cap individual spending and can’t replace the payment terms in an Georgetown offer. It won’t predict actual housing costs and shouldn’t be treated as a scholarship assumption. It is a common comparison case that keeps the main assumptions visible before an applicant commits.

The institution identity is independently recorded by the Research Organization Registry. That confirms the provider behind the bill, while the offer and student account remain the controlling sources for the amount and due dates.

Can an Indian entrant meet Georgetown University MA Global Human Development entry rules?

The official admissions route requires a recognised bachelor’s-equivalent record and programme-specific evidence. For this degree, the useful file demonstrates development experience, quantitative readiness, language preparation and field commitment. The degree title alone is not evidence of subject depth, and a published minimum is not an admission forecast.

The transcript match is strongest when earlier study names the methods behind development economics and programme design. Where a course title is broad, a syllabus or official description can show the topics and assessed depth.

Preparation for Development Theory and Practice should already be visible through development economics. The master’s develops that base; it is not a substitute for every prerequisite the school expects at entry.

Evidence for programme design can come from a substantial university project, laboratory, dissertation or professional assignment. The useful evidence states the problem, method, result and limitations.

The statement has a specific job: connect prior preparation to monitoring and evaluation and explain why Georgetown’s field research route is the next academic step. Repeating the programme description does not establish that progression.

Academic records, literal English translations where required, accepted language evidence and referee responses remain independent completion checks. A strong academic match can still be incomplete if one is missing.

The published No programme minimum published GPA is an eligibility floor, not an offer prediction. Subject depth, the statement, recommendations and the complete application can still distinguish applicants.

MA Global Human Development uses Development Economics as a 3-credit checkpoint. Readiness for development economics is visible before Development Economics, not repaired automatically by enrolment. A transcript item, syllabus topic and assessed result together make that preparation easier to recognise.

MA Global Human Development uses Programme Design as a 3-credit checkpoint. Readiness for programme design is visible before Programme Design, not repaired automatically by enrolment. A transcript item, syllabus topic and assessed result together make that preparation easier to recognise.

MA Global Human Development uses Monitoring And Evaluation as a 3-credit checkpoint. Readiness for monitoring and evaluation is visible before Monitoring And Evaluation, not repaired automatically by enrolment. A transcript item, syllabus topic and assessed result together make that preparation easier to recognise.

MA Global Human Development uses Field Research as a 3-credit checkpoint. Readiness for field research is visible before Field Research, not repaired automatically by enrolment. A transcript item, syllabus topic and assessed result together make that preparation easier to recognise.

MA Global Human Development uses Development Economics as a 3-credit checkpoint. Readiness for development economics is visible before Development Economics, not repaired automatically by enrolment. A transcript item, syllabus topic and assessed result together make that preparation easier to recognise.

Admission preparation for Development Theory and Practice begins with an earlier assessed use of development economics. The applicant should identify the question, method and result in the transcript or supporting syllabus; the 3-credit component then deepens that evidence for development consultant work.

Admission preparation for Quantitative Methods begins with an earlier assessed use of programme design. The applicant should identify the question, method and result in the transcript or supporting syllabus; the 3-credit component then deepens that evidence for programme officer work.

Admission preparation for Field Project begins with an earlier assessed use of monitoring and evaluation. The applicant should identify the question, method and result in the transcript or supporting syllabus; the 3-credit component then deepens that evidence for monitoring and evaluation analyst work.

Admission preparation for Development Capstone begins with an earlier assessed use of field research. The applicant should identify the question, method and result in the transcript or supporting syllabus; the 6-credit component then deepens that evidence for humanitarian programme manager work.

For Georgetown University MA Global Human Development, the admission evidence has to support development economics and programme design before Development Theory and Practice begins. The Walsh School of Foreign Service wording makes this a course-match question, not a branding question about the applicant’s previous university.

A coherent preparation map for Georgetown University MA Global Human Development moves from prior development economics into Development Theory and Practice, then uses Quantitative Methods to extend programme design. Readiness for Field Project is shown through monitoring and evaluation, while Development Capstone makes the field research expectation visible. This sequence is specific to international development practice and policy; a generic claim of quantitative or professional ability would not establish all four links.

Development Theory and Practice makes development economics the first transcript audit for MA Global Human Development. An applicant should point to assessed work that used that capability, name the method and explain the result. A broad claim of interest in international development practice and policy does not establish the same preparation.

The second audit links Quantitative Methods to programme design. Evidence may come from a university course, research project or substantial professional assignment, but the file should state what was personally completed. That distinction is especially important for a future programme officer.

Field Project introduces the monitoring and evaluation test. Where the transcript uses a different course name, a syllabus or project description can make the match visible. Without that detail, Georgetown reviewers may see a related degree without seeing the preparation this Master of Arts in Global Human Development actually uses.

Development Theory and Practice isn’t interchangeable with a broad survey, and MA Global Human Development doesn’t waive development economics preparation. Quantitative Methods can’t repair a missing foundation after admission; programme officer experience won’t automatically count as academic evidence. Applicants shouldn’t assume Field Project is remedial, couldn’t rely on summer field project and client-based capstone to teach every prerequisite, and wouldn’t strengthen the file by hiding a gap. A Master of Arts in Global Human Development application mustn’t leave that preparation unexplained.

Three checks that can block a MA Global Human Development application

1. A GPA floor is not an admission promise

   The No programme minimum published figure is a minimum under Georgetown’s wording. Competitive review can still distinguish applicants through subject depth, statement quality, recommendations or quantitative readiness.

2. The degree title cannot prove prerequisites

   A broad Indian degree title may hide whether development economics and programme design were studied at the expected depth. Syllabi or official course descriptions can make that preparation visible when transcript titles do not.

3. English rules can be programme-specific

   The working reference is TOEFL or IELTS when Georgetown requires proof. Georgetown says individual programmes may set higher rules or restrict test formats, so the exact degree page controls.

How should an Indian applicant apply for Georgetown University MA Global Human Development?

Use the programme application route and treat Fall 2027 closing date must be confirmed on the official programme page as the current timing control. Academic records, recommendations, written statements, English evidence and any programme-specific test must all reach the correct Georgetown office. An offer comes before funding evidence, I-20 processing, SEVIS payment and the F-1 interview.

Select the exact in-person degree, upload the academic and programme documents, pay the international application fee, monitor My Georgetown, clear every offer condition, submit the financial guarantee and then complete the I-20 and F-1 steps.

The allowances are preparation estimates, not deadlines or processing times published by Georgetown University. Start dates remain unconfirmed.

Build the file around Development Economics and Programme Design, not around a generic Georgetown statement. Use earlier coursework or employment to show readiness, then identify the gap that the published curriculum is meant to close.

The official status is Fall 2027 closing date must be confirmed on the official programme page. A priority date and a final closure serve different purposes, and a published academic deadline is separate from the time needed for the I-20 and visa process.

After admission, read the offer and My Georgetown task list line by line. Financial guarantee, final transcripts, immunisation records and I-20 processing can each continue after the academic decision and can each delay enrolment if ignored.

For F-1 planning, check the SEVIS I-901 step and the US visa fee page directly. Fee payment does not guarantee a visa, and a programme offer does not replace consular review.

What jobs can follow Georgetown University MA Global Human Development?

The study plan supports directions such as development consultant, programme officer, monitoring and evaluation analyst and humanitarian programme manager. The programme page does not publish a STEM-OPT designation, but the OPT framework is work authorisation rather than a placement or sponsorship guarantee. Each direction still needs role-specific, inspectable work samples.

These are curriculum-linked directions for MA Global Human Development, not a measured probability of employment, salary, sponsorship or promotion. No guaranteed programme outcome is claimed.

For a development consultant application, work from Development Theory and Practice is most useful when it preserves the brief, inputs, method, decisions and limitations. That record is stronger than a transcript line alone.

The route towards programme officer work draws more directly on Quantitative Methods and programme design. A credible sample shows the trade-off made and the effect of uncertainty, rather than listing software or techniques without context.

A candidate targeting monitoring and evaluation analyst can use Field Project to connect monitoring and evaluation with one inspectable result. The role is a curriculum-linked direction, not a measured placement probability.

The humanitarian programme manager direction depends on how Development Capstone and the culminating work are chosen. Elective access, prior experience and the quality of the retained work sample all affect whether that direction is plausible.

The degree carries no published placement rate, salary promise or employer-sponsorship guarantee. Any OPT period is work authorisation subject to current rules; it does not require an employer to hire the graduate.

This research pass did not locate three independent, exact-programme student accounts. Workload, elective access and team-project experience therefore remain questions rather than claims borrowed from unrelated Georgetown degrees.

Inside MA Global Human Development, Programme Design carries 3 published credits. Its value for a development consultant direction depends on making programme design inspectable. A retained question, method, result and limitation can show what Programme Design added without implying a promised hiring result.

Inside MA Global Human Development, Monitoring And Evaluation carries 3 published credits. Its value for a programme officer direction depends on making monitoring and evaluation inspectable. A retained question, method, result and limitation can show what Monitoring And Evaluation added without implying a promised hiring result.

Inside MA Global Human Development, Field Research carries 3 published credits. Its value for a monitoring and evaluation analyst direction depends on making field research inspectable. A retained question, method, result and limitation can show what Field Research added without implying a promised hiring result.

Inside MA Global Human Development, Development Economics carries 3 published credits. Its value for a humanitarian programme manager direction depends on making development economics inspectable. A retained question, method, result and limitation can show what Development Economics added without implying a promised hiring result.

Inside MA Global Human Development, Programme Design carries 3 published credits. Its value for a development consultant direction depends on making programme design inspectable. A retained question, method, result and limitation can show what Programme Design added without implying a promised hiring result.

The development consultant case inside Georgetown University MA Global Human Development turns on what Development Theory and Practice adds to development economics. A retained output from Development Theory and Practice can show how evidence was selected and how uncertainty changed the decision. That is the programme-specific value of the 3-credit Development Theory and Practice component.

The programme officer case inside Georgetown University MA Global Human Development turns on what Quantitative Methods adds to programme design. A retained output from Quantitative Methods can show how evidence was selected and how uncertainty changed the decision. That is the programme-specific value of the 3-credit Quantitative Methods component.

The monitoring and evaluation analyst case inside Georgetown University MA Global Human Development turns on what Field Project adds to monitoring and evaluation. A retained output from Field Project can show how evidence was selected and how uncertainty changed the decision. That is the programme-specific value of the 3-credit Field Project component.

The humanitarian programme manager case inside Georgetown University MA Global Human Development turns on what Development Capstone adds to field research. A retained output from Development Capstone can show how evidence was selected and how uncertainty changed the decision. That is the programme-specific value of the 6-credit Development Capstone component.

The published culminating work is where Georgetown University MA Global Human Development can join monitoring and evaluation with monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence. Its value depends on the retained method, result and explanation; a capstone label does not create a monitoring and evaluation analyst employment outcome on its own.

The role map for Georgetown University MA Global Human Development also has limits. Development Theory and Practice may support development consultant evidence, but it does not replace the different proof expected for programme officer. Field Project may help a monitoring and evaluation analyst portfolio, while Development Capstone can be more relevant to humanitarian programme manager. Those distinctions keep international development practice and policy outcomes tied to assessed work instead of presenting every graduate as suitable for every adjacent role.

Development Consultant is the clearest direction when Development Theory and Practice produces evidence in development economics. The useful artefact could be an analysis, model, policy brief or implemented decision, depending on the assessment. The programme does not turn that artefact into a hiring promise.

For programme officer work, Quantitative Methods should deepen programme design beyond the applicant’s previous level. A retained output needs enough context for an employer to understand the question, the student’s contribution and the limits of the result.

The monitoring and evaluation analyst direction depends more heavily on Field Project. Its connection to monitoring and evaluation is academically credible, but it remains a capability signal rather than evidence of a Georgetown placement rate, salary level or sponsorship decision.

Summer field project and client-based capstone is the strongest connection toward humanitarian programme manager work when it applies field research to a defined problem. The student should preserve the brief, method, result and caveats where confidentiality allows; otherwise the final requirement may be difficult to demonstrate after graduation.

Who is Georgetown University MA Global Human Development for, and who should avoid it?

A strong fit already has preparation in development economics and programme design, wants assessed evidence in monitoring and evaluation and can fund INR 1.95 crore without promised employment. A weak fit needs foundational repair, wants a different academic centre or depends on uncertain US earnings to make the course affordable.

The positive academic case begins with Development Theory and Practice. A suitable entrant recognises its foundation from previous work but still needs graduate depth in international development practice and policy.

The next fit question is whether Quantitative Methods adds a method or system the applicant cannot already demonstrate. Heavy overlap weakens the value case unless the elective structure can redirect those credits.

For someone pursuing development consultant work, the degree is more useful when monitoring and evaluation produces an artefact that can be inspected and explained. A purely aspirational role title is not evidence of fit.

Someone aiming for programme officer work must also value field research. If that part of the degree has little use in the intended role, a differently structured master’s may be a better match.

The named modules Field Project and Development Capstone create a real choice about depth. A coherent selection builds one capability story; a scattered selection can satisfy credits without producing a clear portfolio.

Affordability is separate from academic fit. The INR 1.95 crore plan excludes flights and a housing deposit, and the rupee amount moves with the exchange rate even when Georgetown leaves a dollar charge unchanged.

This page assumes full-time campus study at Washington, DC. Online or part-time enrolment would change the attendance, living-cost, visa and work-authorisation assumptions and is outside this comparison.

The weakest fit is an applicant who needs extensive prerequisite repair or guaranteed US employment to make the degree viable. Graduate tuition is an expensive way to repeat foundations, and no placement guarantee is published.

An elective-fit reading of Georgetown University MA Global Human Development asks whether development economics closes a prior gap for development consultant work. This 3-credit component remains academic until the candidate can explain its assessment, result and limitations. Credit weight alone cannot predict hiring.

An elective-fit reading of Georgetown University MA Global Human Development asks whether programme design closes a prior gap for programme officer work. This 3-credit component remains academic until the candidate can explain its assessment, result and limitations. Credit weight alone cannot predict hiring.

An elective-fit reading of Georgetown University MA Global Human Development asks whether monitoring and evaluation closes a prior gap for monitoring and evaluation analyst work. This 3-credit component remains academic until the candidate can explain its assessment, result and limitations. Credit weight alone cannot predict hiring.

An elective-fit reading of Georgetown University MA Global Human Development asks whether field research closes a prior gap for humanitarian programme manager work. This 6-credit component remains academic until the candidate can explain its assessment, result and limitations. Credit weight alone cannot predict hiring.

A candidate choosing Georgetown University MA Global Human Development for humanitarian programme manager work should be able to explain why field research matters more than another specialisation. That explanation links international development practice and policy to a real gap in the candidate’s existing record instead of relying on Georgetown’s general reputation.

Four checkpoints distinguish Georgetown University MA Global Human Development: Development Theory and Practice tests development economics for development consultant; Quantitative Methods tests programme design for programme officer; Field Project tests monitoring and evaluation for monitoring and evaluation analyst; and Development Capstone tests field research for humanitarian programme manager. A candidate need not pursue all four roles, but the chosen international development practice and policy route should make one of those links materially stronger than it was before the 48-credit degree.

For development consultant work, development economics matters only when the student can retain and explain a method, result and limitation from Development Theory and Practice. The course title and Georgetown name cannot substitute for that evidence.

Quantitative Methods creates a different checkpoint for the programme officer direction. It adds value when programme design is missing from the applicant’s current record; it adds less when the new study merely repeats prior assessed work.

The decisive comparison is between Field Project and summer field project and client-based capstone. The first builds monitoring and evaluation, while the second should produce inspectable evidence for monitoring and evaluation analyst work. That sequence is more useful than a broad prestige argument.

An applicant targeting humanitarian programme manager should ask whether field research is explicitly assessed. If the answer is no, an attractive elective list cannot repair the mismatch. Another Georgetown master’s may then offer a better use of time and funds.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; development consultant evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; programme officer evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; development consultant evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; programme officer evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; programme officer evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; development consultant evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; programme officer evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Development Capstone in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Development Capstone link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Development Capstone in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Development Capstone link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Development Capstone in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Development Capstone link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests development economics; development consultant evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Development Capstone in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding development economics. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Development Capstone link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing development economics record.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; development consultant evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; programme officer evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Development Theory and Practice in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Development Theory and Practice link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; development consultant evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; programme officer evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Quantitative Methods in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Quantitative Methods link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Development Theory and Practice in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; humanitarian programme manager evidence from Development Theory and Practice must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the humanitarian programme manager comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Theory and Practice to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Quantitative Methods in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; development consultant evidence from Quantitative Methods must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the development consultant comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Quantitative Methods to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Field Project in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; programme officer evidence from Field Project must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the programme officer comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Field Project to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

Development Capstone in MA Global Human Development tests programme design; monitoring and evaluation analyst evidence from Development Capstone must name an assessed result. Field Project in Master of Arts in Global Human Development then changes the monitoring and evaluation analyst comparison by adding programme design. For MA Global Human Development, that Development Capstone to Field Project link matters only when international development practice and policy advances beyond the applicant’s existing programme design record.

What does the Georgetown University MA Global Human Development curriculum contain?

The official curriculum requires 48 credit hours. The table preserves every named coded item found on that page and keeps published curriculum areas where Georgetown directs students to an approved list. Availability and prerequisites still need a live check before enrolment.

The note “Published core or representative curriculum requirement” applies to 4 components in this table.

• Complete 48 approved graduate credit hours.
• Follow the published choice among summer field project and client-based capstone.
• Confirm approved electives, prerequisites and the plan of study with the academic unit.

Use the required sequence to establish readiness for Development Economics, then choose electives that deepen monitoring and evaluation instead of creating several disconnected introductions. The official plan of study remains the authority for what can count together.

Georgetown can revise course availability and approved lists. Recheck every code, credit value, campus offering and culminating route before accepting an offer, especially where the catalogue publishes an area rather than a closed list of named electives.

Should an Indian applicant shortlist the Georgetown University MA Global Human Development?

Shortlist the Georgetown University MA Global Human Development when your transcript already supports development economics and programme design, your intended work uses monitoring and evaluation and the full INR 1.95 crore plan is fundable without depending on uncertain work income. Treat those as separate thresholds.

The strongest case connects Development Economics to Programme Design, then uses the culminating route to create inspectable proof. That is a clearer reason to choose this programme than a general wish to study at a large US university.

The main drawback is cost: the conservative full-programme case is INR 1.95 crore before flights and a housing deposit. Georgetown does not guarantee a job, salary, OPT approval or employer sponsorship for this exact programme. Applicants who need a guaranteed funding or employment outcome should not shortlist it on the university name alone.

Sources

These sources support the programme, admission, cost, experience and immigration information used on this page.

Sources checked on October 5, 2026. Current intake information follows. Fall 2027 full-time route.